3 ms·
That is simply not true. Like, it's literally the opposite of the truth.
by sigmoid10 3y ago
That is simply not true. Like, it's literally the opposite of the truth.
- naasking 3y agoDon't confuse post-hoc curve fitting with predictions: From galactic bars to the Hubble tension: weighing up the astrophysical evidence for Milgromian gravity, https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06936 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06936
- sigmoid10 3y agoYou should read up on how DM is fitted vs how MOND is fitted. But neither preceded the data in the way you imply and DM is vastly more successful at predicting all observations with a single fit.
- naasking 3y agoWhat I know is that MOND predicted the high redshift galaxies we're now seeing 20 years ago, and DM did not: https://tritonstation.com/2022/01/03/what-jwst-will-see/ https://tritonstation.com/2022/01/03/what-jwst-will-see/ There are many instances like this as outlined in the paper I linked.