3 ms·
Randomness? The broad use by the general public, mainstream publications, and many experts (e.g. Google calls their Bard LLM an AI) isn't random. Search for "ge
by criddell 3y ago
Randomness? The broad use by the general public, mainstream publications, and many experts (e.g. Google calls their Bard LLM an AI) isn't random. Search for "generative ai llm" to see for yourself.
- mdp2021 3y ago> Randomness? You were talking about «central authority for determining correctness». I replied that no authority does not mean that there is no "more or less wrong or right". > Google calls their Bard LLM an AI It is a .com :) , what did you expect?
- criddell 3y ago> I replied that no authority does not mean that there is no "more or less wrong or right". I never said there isn't right or wrong, only that what is correct is determined by broad usage. > It is a .com :) , what did you expect? Actually, it's a .google https://ai.google/discover/generativeai https://ai.google/discover/generativeai
- mdp2021 3y ago> I never said there isn't right or wrong, only that what is correct is determined by broad usage Others - like us - call "correct" what seems to be "more right". In the context, I proposed that calling LLMs AI has improper sides - substantially, irregardless of the number of people who would adhere to that use, and which I suspect do so mostly out of inattention. > Actually, it's a .google Yes, but substantially, what I meant is that of course a commercial entity («.com») is using a language that lures glamorously, "sales oriented", before precision.