9 ms·

I will be worried when AI will constantly beat top1 league of legends team in normal environment Chess is way simpler imo.

• Hendrikto 3y ago
  Funny how the benchmarks for proving ”real intelligence“ change every time there is a breakthrough. * ”X would demonstrate real intelligence.“ * Some ML model M beats X. * ”Well, actually, M is not really intelligent. Y would prove real intelligence.“ * repeat
  • worrycue 3y ago
    I think we have a bit of miscommunication here. You see these “benchmarks” as necessary and sufficient for “real intelligence” when people are just saying they are necessary but not sufficient. It’s like asking for a drink (legal age 21) and getting rebuked with a “you aren’t even old enough to drive” (legal age 16). That doesn’t mean you can drink when you are 16! Edit: If you want a hard necessary and sufficient condition for “real intelligence”, mine is “when it can do all of our jobs, i.e. wholesale replace every human”.
    • paulmd 3y ago
      > wholesale replace every human”. As shrimple as that
  • hardware2win 3y ago
    It changes because they ask different ppl.
• M4v3R 3y ago
  AI already has beaten world champions in Dota 2 [1], I can't imagine League is that much more difficult so if someone wanted to build an AI agent to beat everyone else in League they probably could, just no one got around to actually doing it. [1] https://openai.com/research/openai-five-defeats-dota-2-world-champions https://openai.com/research/openai-five-defeats-dota-2-world...
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  • hardware2win 3y ago
    Once or consistently? If they played 100 games, would AI have at least 55% wr?
• deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]