> It's not a fallacy. I feel it is, because it implies it just some statistical trick that's being performed, which is not true at all, imho. I don't know eno

> It's not a fallacy. I feel it is, because it implies it just some statistical trick that's being performed, which is not true at all, imho. I don't know enough about language models, my machine learning knowledge stops to around 2018, but I know from image recognition/style transfer that there's a lot of high-level self-organization/abstraction in those neural nets, and from the results I get from Chat GPT there's no doubt in my mind it's very well capable of reasoning and generalization.