3 ms·
AMO account isn't actually required for the user, it's required for some entity to create the "collection", but you don't actually have to have an account to us
by plorg 3y ago
AMO account isn't actually required for the user, it's required for some entity to create the "collection", but you don't actually have to have an account to use whichever collection with FF on your phone. Certainly most people who are using this method now correspond 1:1 to AMO account holders, but that isn't a necessity of the software. Any sufficiently motivated person could make a collection called "Too Cool For Mozilla Extensions" and tweet out the user name and collection name, and anyone who wanted could use that collection instead.
You also can sideload apps in Nightly, although I understand that is not ideal.
- 38 3y ago> AMO account isn't actually required for the user, it's required for some entity to create the "collection", but you don't actually have to have an account to use whichever collection with FF on your phone. the backwards logic to justify this sentence is mind boggling. I wrote my own extension, I should be able to install it on my own device without getting permission from daddy Mozilla, period. I should not have to register for that, in the same way I dont have to register with Debian to install a program on Linux.