I just think it’s laughable that they think encryption is the constraint. If one could make the argument that the police force was 1)staffed with smart, moral,

I just think it’s laughable that they think encryption is the constraint. If one could make the argument that the police force was 1)staffed with smart, moral, motivated, and well trained individuals, and 2) had adequate capacity and resources to pursue these crimes, and the only thing standing in their way was encryption, I’d at least be willing to entertain the conversation, but since little emphasis seems to be placed and 1&2, it’s hard to take this line of argument seriously.