> From the screenshots, I think it is only a fake wet signature. I'm not sure how valid that is. This seems perfectly acceptable in my jurisdiction. Then again

> From the screenshots, I think it is only a fake wet signature. I'm not sure how valid that is. This seems perfectly acceptable in my jurisdiction. Then again, Kentucky is pretty laid back. By statute, an electronic signature is just a mark made electronically that is intended by the signer to be a signature. That's about it. Same as if I were to sign by hand, but electronic. Call me naive, but these laws that make electronic signatures some complicated thing seem messy to me. It's a signature. If you want to verify ID, then do that, but don't conflate the two.