3 ms·
Open source licenses don't require you to do those things. That was the intention in coming up with them. They were the Bazaar people. They sold open source as
by pessimizer 3y ago
Open source licenses don't require you to do those things. That was the intention in coming up with them.
They were the Bazaar people. They sold open source as something that makes software quality better. It was the counterpoint to Free Software, who said they made programs morally better, and that it was largely irrelevant whether copyleft made software quality better.
- davorak 3y ago> Open source licenses don't require you to do those things. That was the intention in coming up with them. I mentioned the cases I have seen the word abuse used as a counter point to 'If somebody doesn't want any competitors' which is not something I have seen brought up when taking about abusing the spirit of open source. I was not taking about what the licenses legally bind you to do.