4 ms·
I don't see it this way. As someone who is capable of programming these tools in novel ways, I see it as a new method of translating the abstract patterns I hav
by heurist 3y ago
I don't see it this way. As someone who is capable of programming these tools in novel ways, I see it as a new method of translating the abstract patterns I have inside me into a more corporeal form that can be shared and interact in the global conversation. As an amateur artist it helps me produce a higher quality representation of whatever is in my mind, and often finds imagery that appeals to me on a deeper level than I have ever really been able to achieve on my own. I continue to practice without the machines (that's where you learn how to be creative), but I must be practical because I don't have much time for creation and have some aspiration of growing into a more creative career.
It's an instrument that few people understand yet and which lacks soul unless imbued with soul. It's a projector that expands whatever you feed into it. It can be used to create massive volume, and in the future that will be critical because there will be huge amounts of noise in the information atmosphere that can only be overcome by being bigger and louder. Don't dissuade the artists from using this - they're up against a typhoon of cacophony and need all the help they can get.
- mark-wagner 3y agoI agree. I see ChatGPT as similar to music synthesizers. They enable creativity. Creativity in novel ways as well. What if you want to express yourself with a violin sound but don't know how to play one?
- jddj 3y agoGreat rhetorical question which touches on the issues nicely. Something special does feel lost by us being able to play a (near) perfect violin sound at the press of a button. On the other hand, some lovely pieces have been made with those buttons. It seems reasonable that new technologies might stretch both of these outcomes, maybe not in equal parts.