4 ms·
It's so laughably stupid. "Trust us, we have a safety mechanism in place." What safety mechanism? Can they elaborate, especially when they're asking for backd
by scohesc 3y ago
It's so laughably stupid.
"Trust us, we have a safety mechanism in place."
What safety mechanism? Can they elaborate, especially when they're asking for backdoors/tools that will enable them to view private messages of anybody using the platform?
This is just a complete violation of individual privacy rights. Hope there's other apps and platforms out there that will operate just out of the governments eyes that will still offer encrypted messaging.
I'm not an encryption guru and I don't know the specifics about how they want to add a backdoor to these apps, but can't we generate our own keys to share between people we want to communicate with, removing the need to have these apps provide encryption?
Never trust your government (at least in the western world! Some european countries do actually care about their people). They don't care about you one bit other than your ability to shut up and pay taxes. You are a resource to them and if they can control you by reading your messages and punishing you if try and go against their rules, they will.
- twarge 3y agoPerhaps Hanlon’s razor should be evaluated before going quite this far? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor
- saikia81 3y agoHe is not saying they are malicious in their intent. The policy can still be attributed to stupidity/ignorance. The issue is that once given the power, it will be abused. Never trust anyone to point a gun at you or string a sword above your head. It will be abused at some point.
- patrick451 3y agoHanlon's razor is a bad heuristic. It ignores the very basic fact of human existence that Power is more addictive than heroine and more alluring than the Ring. Assuming power hungry fiends are just stupid is at best naive.