4 ms·

For comparison, I asked ChatGPT to build one and here's what I got in one shot: https://chat.openai.com/share/b4b399ef-1def-4f68-b2f1-8c56ca3858ae https://chat

by 33a 3y ago

For comparison, I asked ChatGPT to build one and here's what I got in one shot: https://chat.openai.com/share/b4b399ef-1def-4f68-b2f1-8c56ca3858ae https://chat.openai.com/share/b4b399ef-1def-4f68-b2f1-8c56ca... Seems to work correctly, didn't have to change anything in the code. Like all the other agenty stuff I've seen it's not clear what the fluff adds over just prompting the base model.

kosh2 3y ago
Maybe simply a larger task? "Write 10 popular mini games" --> What are those games? 1. Agent --> How does each of them work? 2. Agent --> Write each of those. Agent 3-13
- 33a 3y ago
  I'm just using the examples from the paper. Here's another one: "Implement a Gomoku game using Python, incorporating an AI opponent with varying difficulty levels." One shot prompt works fine: https://chat.openai.com/share/4435152f-ba13-45a5-a116-eb4f57b27ab2 https://chat.openai.com/share/4435152f-ba13-45a5-a116-eb4f57... AFAICT using ChatGPT directly gets you better results with lower cost and less complexity. The "MetaGPT" framework adds bloat and delivers nothing.