3 ms·
I'm afraid GPT-4 has more common sense than a typical HN commenter: > How do you define edible in context of making recipes? > In the context of making recipe
by killerstorm 3y ago
I'm afraid GPT-4 has more common sense than a typical HN commenter:
> How do you define edible in context of making recipes?
> In the context of making recipes, "edible" typically refers to food items that are safe to consume without causing harm or discomfort. However, the definition can be more nuanced based on culinary, cultural, nutritional, and individual considerations. Here's a breakdown:
> Safety: The most basic definition of edible is that something can be eaten without causing immediate harm or long-term health risks. For instance, certain mushrooms are toxic and not edible, while others are safe and delicious.
> Digestibility: Even if a food isn't toxic, it might be hard for humans to digest. Some foods can be edible when cooked but not when raw, like certain beans which contain harmful compounds when uncooked.
...
- dylan604 3y agoNo, time and time again, ChatGPT has proven that it doesn't have more common sense than an HN commenter. So yes, I know what edible means, but why would we assume ChatGPT does? Your snark just shows your unwillingness to be open about the limits of LLMs. Maybe you're a shill in sheeps clothing, but discounting conversations because they ask questions you might not like is just wasting time
- killerstorm 3y agoWell, you wrote: "Chlorine is edible too. So is arsenic, bug spray...". So we have direct evidence that GPT-4 has more common sense than you.