3 ms·
> Having taken math courses for math majors at both an Ivy school and a decent non-Ivy, it is my experience that while they teach roughly the same subjects, the
by laidoffamazon 3y ago
> Having taken math courses for math majors at both an Ivy school and a decent non-Ivy, it is my experience that while they teach roughly the same subjects, they do not teach the same things within those subjects, nor at the same pace, nor to the same level of rigor. Nor are the students in those classes equally good at math. So, while sorting those students can and does contribute to injustice (especially with the actual way it's done!), it's also not a completely pointless just for the sake of giving gold stars.
OK, and? How does this change anything? You have to be a PhD to be a mathematician anyway.
I've become negatively polarized against this rigor fetishization, which serves exclusively to otherize normal folks in increasingly esoteric ways
- less_less 3y ago> OK, and? How does this change anything? You have to be a PhD to be a mathematician anyway. I don't understand your objection. Comprehensive math training is useful in areas other than academic research math, and it's not like PhD programs erase or overwrite all math instruction from before you entered that program.
- laidoffamazon 3y agoI don't think it matters at all, actually. Covering 10% less material in a real analysis class at Wayne State vs. MIT has basically no bearing on society, or even the students at either.