4 ms·
Cardboard is edible. If it is healthy is another question altogether.
by consp 3y ago
Cardboard is edible. If it is healthy is another question altogether.
- hypertele-Xii 3y agoMichel Lotito is in the Guinness World Records for having eaten 18 bicycles, 15 supermarket trolleys, seven TV sets, six chandeliers, two beds, a pair of skis, a Cessna light aircraft and a computer.
- dylan604 3y agoThat’s my point. Chlorine is edible too. So is arsenic, bug spray, and a plethora of other toxic substances. So your pedantic response was already covered.
- digging 3y agoWell, no. Chlorine is unsafe. Cardboard is just not nutritious. They're different categories.
- smileysteve 3y agoCardboard provides insoluble fiber (and binding agents); How does one differentiate between cardboard ground in a smoothie and metamucil/glucomannan? Carboard's nutritional profile might even be better than many processed carbs (pasta, rice) when considering the fiber. Or that cellulose is a top ingredient to keep things like powdered parmesan cheese dry?
- killerstorm 3y agoI'm afraid GPT-4 has more common sense than a typical HN commenter: > How do you define edible in context of making recipes? > In the context of making recipes, "edible" typically refers to food items that are safe to consume without causing harm or discomfort. However, the definition can be more nuanced based on culinary, cultural, nutritional, and individual considerations. Here's a breakdown: > Safety: The most basic definition of edible is that something can be eaten without causing immediate harm or long-term health risks. For instance, certain mushrooms are toxic and not edible, while others are safe and delicious. > Digestibility: Even if a food isn't toxic, it might be hard for humans to digest. Some foods can be edible when cooked but not when raw, like certain beans which contain harmful compounds when uncooked. ...
- dylan604 3y agoNo, time and time again, ChatGPT has proven that it doesn't have more common sense than an HN commenter. So yes, I know what edible means, but why would we assume ChatGPT does? Your snark just shows your unwillingness to be open about the limits of LLMs. Maybe you're a shill in sheeps clothing, but discounting conversations because they ask questions you might not like is just wasting time
- killerstorm 3y agoWell, you wrote: "Chlorine is edible too. So is arsenic, bug spray...". So we have direct evidence that GPT-4 has more common sense than you.