3 ms·
The answer is to pay school teachers more, not demand everyone else be paid less.
by sdairs 3y ago
The answer is to pay school teachers more, not demand everyone else be paid less.
- matthewfelgate 3y agoI don't think delivery drivers should be paid three times the salary of teachers.
- gumballindie 3y agoSurely the solution you have in mind is to increase teacher salaries, right?
- HL33tibCe7 3y agoWow, why didn't anybody think of that before?
- redeux 3y agoThen the answer is to pay teachers more, not others less, right?
- gumballindie 3y agoI don't understand these people's mindsets. I've read a few comments on reddit stating that SWE should earn less because so does everyone else, instead of wanting for everyone else to earn more. Unbealivable how some people just want to pull others down out of spite.
- HL33tibCe7 3y agoIf everyone else earns more, nobody else earns more, because of inflation
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- evandijk70 3y agoSupporters would probably say that this would come at the expense of investors/shareholders.
- HL33tibCe7 3y agoIt doesn’t, it comes at the expense of other people in the delivery driving industry, who are kept out of UPS jobs by the union
- piva00 3y agoYou really have an ax to grind on this subject. Can you explain in more depth what you mean by that, exactly?
- quickthrower2 3y agoIn a zero sum world this is true. However if we have technology to harness energy more cheaply and produce what we need more cheaply you will simply have abundance. But if everyone is doing BS work and fighting over a dwindling supply of good things, you have high inflation of those good things and they become unaffordable.
- orbz 3y agoYou’re right, I think the implication is executives and shareholders earning less to make that happen.
- pulse7 3y agoWhats the actual difference? If everyone gets $170k or if everyone gets $100k or if everyone gets $50k? They will all get the same amount...