4 ms·
The fulltext of the study, which is free, is here: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ace101/pdf https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/
by A_D_E_P_T 3y ago
The fulltext of the study, which is free, is here:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ace101/pdf https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ace101/...
What's important to note is that while the work is suggestive, it's far from conclusive. The author notes, however, that "even stronger results than the present results are expected with later data releases of Gaia." So, presumably, we'll have more evidence very soon --- and, if not, the way to bet is that this finding will turn out to be due to the instrumentation's margins of uncertainty.
The author also notes that "a recent study by Mistele (2023) showed that predictions of the AeST theory agree broadly with the results of this work." Which suggests that the AeST theory might be worth a look!
- bsaul 3y agohave any link explaining aest ?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- A_D_E_P_T 3y agoThe Mistele paper referenced is pretty interesting: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.07742.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.07742.pdf It's a MOND-derivative theory, so the Milgrom and Bekenstein MOND papers are foundational.
- T-A 3y agohttps://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00082 https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00082