3 ms·
Sounds like in such a case the same can occur with a recipe invented by human.
by yreg 3y ago
Sounds like in such a case the same can occur with a recipe invented by human.
- ben_w 3y agoCan, yes. I bet that if a supermarket suggested winging it with fugu or moonshine this would also be criticised.
- mdp2021 3y ago> [OP: ] this is why you need a trustworthy source > the same can occur with a recipe invented by human Yes, this is why we do not take advice from random humans on random matters, this is why we want qualified, educated, expert opinions.
- yreg 3y agoWe do take advice on cooking from internet randos though. If you don't then I believe you are in a small minority.
- mdp2021 3y agoAnd the «responsibility» that Berkes was talking about also refers to knowing that the information from «randos» may be wrong, ignorant, deceitful. And in many cases, I observed, that instances are such is not apparent (you are looking for advice after all). But while human condition should be known, the more specialized the tool the more the responsibility is brought to the tool, not to the user. If John says it you may want to check; if the book says it you should still put limited trust, but the fault in bad information lies more in the proclaimed authority. You heard of "Fool me once shame on you; fool me twice shame on me": here, "Fool me by fool shame on me; fool me by foolery shame on you". > minority "Descriptive" and "prescriptive" don't overlap.