3 ms·
The 'knowledge worker' section would be a lot more convincing if it provided citations.
by swampthing 15y ago
The 'knowledge worker' section would be a lot more convincing if it provided citations.
- magicalist 15y agothere are several links in there citing sources, the second of which is to a paper from the author's relative(? spouse?), which it explicitly notes "contains a wealth of links to studies conducted by businesses, universities, industry associations and the military that supported early-20th-century leaders as they embraced the short week": http://www.igda.org/why-crunch-modes-doesnt-work-six-lessons http://www.igda.org/why-crunch-modes-doesnt-work-six-lessons
- swampthing 15y agoSorry, I meant to write about the 'knowledge worker' section in particular. I've edited to reflect that. The only cite in that section is supposedly to a US military study but actually goes to a findarticles.com page that doesn't directly support the statement being cited and that makes no reference to said study.
- einhverfr 15y agoA larger question would be whether integrative living (i.e. working from home, spending your coffee breaks with your kids) impacts the optimal level of work. I would bet that knowledge workers burn out FASTER from being overworked than manual laborers. Knowledge work, particularly the inductive side, relies on downtime in order to stay productive.
- DanBC 15y agoI'm guessing that having a shitty boss affects manual workers about as much as knowledge workers. Production drops; errors increase; sick leave increases; levels of stress are spread to colleagues; etc.
- steve-howard 15y agoOvertime and burnout were covered in Peopleware back in 1987. Looks like we're doomed to relearn our lessons again and again...
- einhverfr 15y agoBut my experience is that I burn out a lot slower if I am working at home and taking my breaks with my family. So that is a different circumstance not covered in such work.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- carboncrank 15y agoTotally agree and I'd go further. I struggled to get past the tendentiousness of the sentence: "Yes, this flies in the face of everything modern management thinks it knows about work." Which is obviously just BS on stilts (not to mention an insult to myriad researchers).