3 ms·
I already alluded[1] to the incentives for the host to minify their JavaShit, et al., and you would have a point if it wasn't for the fact that performance othe
by Dalewyn 3y ago
I already alluded[1] to the incentives for the host to minify their JavaShit, et al., and you would have a point if it wasn't for the fact that performance otherwise isn't significantly different between minified and full source code as far as the user would be concerned.
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37072473 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37072473
- midoridensha 3y agoI'm not talking about the browser's performance, I'm talking about the network bandwidth. All that extra JS code in every HTTP GET adds up. For a large site serving countless users, it adds up to a lot of bandwidth.
- bee_rider 3y agoSomebody mentioned negligible/deleterious impacts on bandwidth for minified code in that thread, but they seemed to have low certainty. If you happen to have evidence otherwise, it might be informative for them.
- mannerheim 3y ago>JavaShit Glad to see the diversity of HN readers apparently includes twelve year olds. Anyway, you do realise plenty of languages have compilers with JS as a compilation target, right? How readable do you think that is?
- Dalewyn 3y ago>Glad to see the diversity of HN readers apparently includes twelve year olds. The abuse of JavaScript does not deserve the respect of being called by a proper name. >Anyway, you do realise plenty of languages have compilers with JS as a compilation target, right? How readable do you think that is? If you're going to run "compiled" code through an interpreter anyway, is that really compiled code?
- mannerheim 3y ago>In computing, a compiler is a computer program that translates computer code written in one programming language (the source language) into another language (the target language).