3 ms·
I think DeepL is considered to be quite good for translations nowadays https://www.deepl.com/translator https://www.deepl.com/translator
by MarcusE1W 3y ago
I think DeepL is considered to be quite good for translations nowadays
https://www.deepl.com/translator https://www.deepl.com/translator
- isaacfrond 3y agoIt doesn't support Traditional Chinese though, let alone the Taiwanese dialect...
- sgt 3y agoSeems better but it's definitely easy to spot when something has been machine translated, even when using DeepL. Did a test now and if you translate from English into a target language, the corresponding text is definitely not the way a native speaker would formulate it.
- input_sh 3y agoIt currently supports exactly 4 non-European languages. It won't be a proper Google Translate alternative until it supports at least 3x as many languages.
- brational 3y agoTheir Spanish-English is significantly more idiomatic than google but as others have said - far fewer languages supported. But I suspect deepl will continue to be better than google as they grow.