> That would be a silly objection, like claiming restaurants are exploiting people's hunger by selling food for money. A bit of a broken analogy, but if I were

> That would be a silly objection, like claiming restaurants are exploiting people's hunger by selling food for money. A bit of a broken analogy, but if I were to indulge, it’s similar to denying rice to starving people who’ve lost all worldly possessions in a war-ravaged country because they couldn’t pay up. There are wellness apps that give a no-questions-asked zero subscription to anyone who says they can't afford the cost. This is potentially one way out. But a freemium model, where paying people get better features of some consequence, is a little demoralizing, and you probably don't want to demoralize people with mental health issues, IMHO