3 ms·
Their feature showcase with fascism makes their version seem more biased than the Wikipedia version. I recognise we can debate whether Stalin was a true commun
by Svip 3y ago
Their feature showcase with fascism makes their version seem more biased than the Wikipedia version. I recognise we can debate whether Stalin was a true communist and not just a fascist in disguise, but leading your article with that (by virtue of having his picture before Hitler's in reading direction) seems very subjective.
- fake-name 3y agoLook at their citations. This is just right wing whitewashing with a veneer of "it's unbiased" (because it doesn't say bad things about us now).
- bawolff 3y agoI agree that their version seems more sympathetic and biased imho, but it doesn't seem 100% whitewashed. For example "...[facism is] a fear-built society based on the “common will” of the people, the stifling of dissent and persecution of minority groups, and militarism and imperialism by conquering and ruling weak nations." doesn't exactly sound positive to me.
- timeon 3y agoThey also removed all occurrences of term 'far-right' there...