3 ms·
They redirect to `www.justapedia.org` but don't have a SAN in their ssl cert for it. Doesn't seem like a good start.
by denkmoon 3y ago
They redirect to `www.justapedia.org` but don't have a SAN in their ssl cert for it. Doesn't seem like a good start.
- bawolff 3y agoI mean,its not their fault hn is using an incorrect link.
- sebazzz 3y agoIt is a common practice to have www as a SAN, even if it is just for a redirect. It costs nothing extra either as it is often included by default in my experience.
- bawolff 3y agoThey use lets encrypt so its all free. It just seems a weird thing to complain about for a site just starting out. Sure it could be more polished, but also people could just link to the correct url.
- RamRodification 3y agoNot weird at all. If you are listening on www. then you should have a certificate for it. Super basic stuff.
- bawolff 3y agoThey're listening on all subdomains. Its not like they explicitly enabled www. https://foo.justapedia.org/ https://foo.justapedia.org/ has the same problem. IDK, i just think this is all incredibly nitpicky and really doesn't matter
- harshreality 3y agoNo, but it is their fault for not caring that people will use www and no-www interchangeably, and not having a SAN and redirect for the secondary one. That's objectively a usability problem for the website.