4 ms·
IMO, voice alteration in general would undermine the concept, which is to hear genuine human voices. That seems like the opposite of what you want. Have you co
by p-e-w 3y ago
IMO, voice alteration in general would undermine the concept, which is to hear genuine human voices. That seems like the opposite of what you want.
Have you considered limiting the number of voice messages non-paying users can post? As in, free users can post up to 5 messages per month, while paying users can post an unlimited number. Everybody can listen to as many messages as they want. The desire to "get your voice out" can be a powerful incentive to subscribe.
- jaybhum 3y agoI am not sure if going with limited messages is the right idea. I do want to make this platform available to people to form meaningful connections regardless of their wallet. I think having voice alteration as a premium feature so that it is not abuse-able but accessible to people who are willing to pay for it for the extra layer of privacy, could be a net boon for the network. Still food for thought :)