4 ms·
I have updated the website now to include that link. Thank you. As far as monetization goes, we plan to add premium features like stickers, and voice changers.
by jaybhum 3y ago
I have updated the website now to include that link. Thank you.
As far as monetization goes, we plan to add premium features like stickers, and voice changers. There will be people who do not want to talk with their voice precisely for the reason you mentioned: one can consider it to be a sensitive data. Why do we want to offer voice-alteration as a paid feature? Because, if it is free for all, we fear that there will be people abusing the feature that jeopardizes the authenticity of the platform.
We do NOT plan to sell or share users' data with a third party, or use users' data to train an internal AI model because I think that fundamentally betrays the goodwill that users bring to our platform.
- p-e-w 3y agoIMO, voice alteration in general would undermine the concept, which is to hear genuine human voices. That seems like the opposite of what you want. Have you considered limiting the number of voice messages non-paying users can post? As in, free users can post up to 5 messages per month, while paying users can post an unlimited number. Everybody can listen to as many messages as they want. The desire to "get your voice out" can be a powerful incentive to subscribe.
- jaybhum 3y agoI am not sure if going with limited messages is the right idea. I do want to make this platform available to people to form meaningful connections regardless of their wallet. I think having voice alteration as a premium feature so that it is not abuse-able but accessible to people who are willing to pay for it for the extra layer of privacy, could be a net boon for the network. Still food for thought :)