4 ms·
This is a common misconception. The wages are slave wages to the first world economies, but not to the developing world. China for example has seen a massive
by flextheruler 3y ago
This is a common misconception.
The wages are slave wages to the first world economies, but not to the developing world.
China for example has seen a massive decrease in the percentage of the population living below the poverty line as they’ve become the largest manufacturer.
At the end of the day these people are choosing to leave their farms to work in these factories because it enriches them. I’m not saying they’re great jobs, especially to us, but it’s not slavery.
- gtowey 3y ago> This is a common misconception. > The wages are slave wages to the first world economies, but not to the developing world. I know of this rationalization, but I don't agree it makes things ok. Look at the Foxconn debacle where employees were committing suicide and strikes for better conditions were met with violence. It doesn't matter if their wages are technically slightly higher than the prevailing local wages. If you look at their quality of life, it's deplorable. Health care? Clean water? Safe homes? Paid sick leave? Work-life balance? Disability protection? Retirement plans? Do workers in China not deserve those things? Why aren't first world business paying first world wages no matter where their workers are? They know they extract profits at the cost of human dignity for their workers. They know that offshoring jobs allows them to ignore American labor laws. It's not ethical. But as long as it happens somewhere else we can pretend it's not our problem.