7 ms·
plus in places like South America uber is the far safer option. I know my wife and her friends hated taking taxis as they were much more likely to be sexually h
by bogota 3y ago
plus in places like South America uber is the far safer option. I know my wife and her friends hated taking taxis as they were much more likely to be sexually harassed or deal with some strange person. Uber isn’t perfect but it has significantly reduced this since the people who do it get kicked off the app.
A lot of complaints i see on HN are very first world and don’t see how much some of these companies actually help.
- lll-o-lll 3y ago> A lot of complaints i see on HN are very first world and don’t see how much some of these companies actually help. These companies are not set up as charities. If they happen to help people, that’s a side affect of the primary purpose - generate maximum revenue. Regulation is required where a businesses incentives do not align with societies (mining is an easy example). As much as C level execs will argue, self regulation has never been an effective mechanism. So Uber is incentivised, naturally, to provide a safe experience for a rider, as to do otherwise would reduce revenue. They are not incentivised to provide their drivers any semblance of a “life worth living”, as it has no positive correlation to revenue. This isn’t out of malice, it’s just economics at work. If we, as a society, want a better standard of living for gig workers, then regulation, flawed as it is, is the only mechanism I know of that has some chance of working.