4 ms·
Or have protections that aren't related to work. We can't have it both ways with utter flexibility on the business side and no support on the social side. Cutt
by makeitdouble 3y ago
Or have protections that aren't related to work.
We can't have it both ways with utter flexibility on the business side and no support on the social side. Cutting flexibility on the business side is an option, the other is to increase the support without an employer paying for it.
- bcrosby95 3y agoSo more taxes to pay for support. Both will be opposed by the same group of lobbyists. You're paying a game of "heads I win, tails you lose" with them.
- whimsicalism 3y agoA large part of what matters is voters and I personally would absolutely vote to expand social safety net but would vote against any effort to move to a European style of employment law (ie. no at-will).