> What would you consider a high information density program? Meet Renoise, love of my life. https://i.imgur.com/yxekqbW.png https://i.imgur.com/yxekqbW.png

> What would you consider a high information density program? Meet Renoise, love of my life. https://i.imgur.com/yxekqbW.png https://i.imgur.com/yxekqbW.png Though that's probably more high knob density than information density, I wouldn't want to have it any other way. For me, subtle gradients and borders and such are not just a matter of being prettier (to me), but they really help the eye along. e.g. this is my HN stylesheet: https://i.imgur.com/XRPuhNc.png https://i.imgur.com/XRPuhNc.png Flat design is Workbench 1.3. Okay for 1985. Then came Workbench 2.0, then 3.0 with Magic User Interface Icons, a clear progression. Why would I want to go back from that? Speaking of Amiga and continuous progress, for me the god king emperor of interfaces is Directory Opus. As long as that only exists on Windows, I'll always run windows, if even just in a VM with access to the host filesystem. But one that is hard to show off in screenshots because unless you show 50 screenshots of custom configurations, you'll sell it short. Instead, maybe click around in the docs, don't read so much but spend 5 clicking on all the pages, and skim them, you'll see what I mean. To me it is the gold standard for everything. https://www.gpsoft.com.au/help/opus12/index.html https://www.gpsoft.com.au/help/opus12/index.html