> It baffles me why this would be successful SEO -- and assuming that it actually isn't, it baffles me why CNET thinks it would be. If the content deleted is g

> It baffles me why this would be successful SEO -- and assuming that it actually isn't, it baffles me why CNET thinks it would be. If the content deleted is garbage, why wouldn't it help? No clue on CNET's overall quality, but I don't have a favorable image of it. Just had a look at their main page and that did not do it any favors.