4 ms·
It's worse than that because "giving it to the masses" actually means telling people how to think. It's not like current chatbots represent a broad range of vie
by version_five 3y ago
It's worse than that because "giving it to the masses" actually means telling people how to think. It's not like current chatbots represent a broad range of viewpoints, it's the median of the internet censored by coastal US tech values.
Giving it to people is arguably the worst kind of missionary work or colonialism or whatever you want to call it.
- klyrs 3y agoI believe it's called an idiocracy.
- why_only_15 3y agoIf it's so bad, people can just choose not to use it!
- johnnyworker 3y agoThe minds of the people who depend on it will atrophy. Will they accept that and leave the rest alone? Will they even be able to understand what they lost? A casual glance at the world around me tells me no, of course not.