3 ms·

Hadnt realised Twitter put in place limits like that. So literally they are blocking their power users, the ones who make the most content for other users.

duskwuff 3y ago
> So literally they are blocking their power users, the ones who make the most content for other users. AND they've made changes to their site which have rendered it impractical to use as a public "status page" -- for logged-out visitors, posts on an account's profile page are ordered by the number of likes, not chronologically, and pages for individual posts don't display replies. Take a look at what this does to the National Weather Service's page, for example [1]. What's on top? Posts from years ago warning about hurricanes that have long since passed. They're still making posts about active weather threats, but there's no way to see them if you aren't logged in -- so it's no longer an effective way to reach the public at large. Nor does it help that their widget for embedding a Twitter feed on a web site has been broken for over a month [2]! [1]: https://twitter.com/NWS https://twitter.com/NWS [2]: https://twittercommunity.com/t/embedded-tweets-not-working/199477 https://twittercommunity.com/t/embedded-tweets-not-working/1...
LiquidSky 3y ago
Musks’s bizarre decisions in running Twitter seem to stem from a belief that the Twitter platform itself is what draws in users, rather than the content on the platform. It’s quite baffling how someone who seems to spend every waking moment on the service has such a poor understanding of it.
- swarnie 3y ago
  I can't be convinced that this whole situation isn't just a group of tyrannical regimes and finance heavies clubbing together to bury Twitter (often used as a co-ordination place against their interests) and are simply using Musk as a front man because they have leverage over him. Or maybe the worlds greatest genius just got in a dick waving contest with himself and lost.
  - tetris11 3y ago
    It's an attack on progressives. That's how I've been viewing all of this. I can believe Zuckerberg is not a fan of Musks handling because Z tried to keep his users but manipulate their beliefs via targeted political posts (and this worked to some degree). Musk screwed the pooch and is just kicking out his users, which doesn't disempower them, it just makes them look elsewhere.
    - w0de0 3y ago
      Interesting - but I don’t assume malicious intent when incompetence is a simpler explanation. Wealth does not imply universal competence, though it often gives its beneficiaries such a delusion.
      - CP3f6kMA 3y ago
        Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice

duskwuff 3y ago

> So literally they are blocking their power users, the ones who make the most content for other users. AND they've made changes to their site which have rendered it impractical to use as a public "status page" -- for logged-out visitors, posts on an account's profile page are ordered by the number of likes, not chronologically, and pages for individual posts don't display replies. Take a look at what this does to the National Weather Service's page, for example [1]. What's on top? Posts from years ago warning about hurricanes that have long since passed. They're still making posts about active weather threats, but there's no way to see them if you aren't logged in -- so it's no longer an effective way to reach the public at large. Nor does it help that their widget for embedding a Twitter feed on a web site has been broken for over a month [2]! [1]: https://twitter.com/NWS https://twitter.com/NWS [2]: https://twittercommunity.com/t/embedded-tweets-not-working/199477 https://twittercommunity.com/t/embedded-tweets-not-working/1...

LiquidSky 3y ago

Musks’s bizarre decisions in running Twitter seem to stem from a belief that the Twitter platform itself is what draws in users, rather than the content on the platform. It’s quite baffling how someone who seems to spend every waking moment on the service has such a poor understanding of it.

swarnie 3y ago
I can't be convinced that this whole situation isn't just a group of tyrannical regimes and finance heavies clubbing together to bury Twitter (often used as a co-ordination place against their interests) and are simply using Musk as a front man because they have leverage over him. Or maybe the worlds greatest genius just got in a dick waving contest with himself and lost.
- tetris11 3y ago
  It's an attack on progressives. That's how I've been viewing all of this. I can believe Zuckerberg is not a fan of Musks handling because Z tried to keep his users but manipulate their beliefs via targeted political posts (and this worked to some degree). Musk screwed the pooch and is just kicking out his users, which doesn't disempower them, it just makes them look elsewhere.
  - w0de0 3y ago
    Interesting - but I don’t assume malicious intent when incompetence is a simpler explanation. Wealth does not imply universal competence, though it often gives its beneficiaries such a delusion.
    - CP3f6kMA 3y ago
      Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice