My point was that it is ontologically opposed to its purpose and inception. It was on track and sent off the rails. It required a start, it changed its directio

My point was that it is ontologically opposed to its purpose and inception. It was on track and sent off the rails. It required a start, it changed its direction, and is no longer the same project in spirit. Urbit as the original idea which was not supposed to change has changed and more specifically Tlon is responsible for the change of direction which they’ve even forked into multiple teams now. There existed at some point progress towards the vision of Urbit, and as of now it is so far beyond that scope it has retreated from a static namespace of computational vapor ware into perpetual “non-maxwellian” ever-growing “ball of mud” bolted onto the status-quo of today with ever increasing complexity. \(-.-)/