3 ms·
I think it's more of a compliance test than anything else. They already have all the facial recog data they would need, or could easily source it.
by rgrieselhuber 3y ago
I think it's more of a compliance test than anything else. They already have all the facial recog data they would need, or could easily source it.
- at-fates-hands 3y agoThis just gives them another vector to prove its actually you. Matching finger print data with facial recog is about as close as you can get to foolproof identity analysis I would think. I know both can be faked, but for a majority of the population, having these two markers would be almost impossible to claim it wasn't you.
- rgrieselhuber 3y agoThis is what government ids are already for. Instead of creating new systems to strip away privacy rights, spend more time enforcing laws and prosecuting identity theft. Tying identity to biometrics makes it involuntary at some point down the road, which is obviously the real intention.