4 ms·
OK, but how does that account for the fact that the atmosphere thins? I'm not a physicist but it seems to me that given entropy and the thinning of the atmosph
by sudsy7 3y ago
OK, but how does that account for the fact that the atmosphere thins?
I'm not a physicist but it seems to me that given entropy and the thinning of the atmosphere as elevation increases that clouds would not a) not appear to float in place and b) only move in one direction.
Low clouds would appear to float in place but high clouds would move quickly away from the spin of the earth.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoHigh clouds do move more quickly! Not sure how someone would go about proving this with household tools
- sudsy7 3y agoI don't know either, but one fun fact is that you can measure the temperature of reflected moonlight with a $20 laser thermometer. It's reflecting sunlight right, so why does moonlight register as colder than shaded spots. It's a real easy and fun experiment.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoThat one is probably out of my pay grade. One guess is that the Moon is not a perfect reflector and the photon density per unit area coming off the Moon is a lot lower. You could test this hypothesis by pointing a laser thermometer at a light bulb and a pile of dirt reflecting the light from the bulb. The Moon is basically made out of gray dirt.
- sudsy7 3y agoGround in the shade may have some insulation? You'd think open ground would be warmer at night because it's unshaded, and because the moon is supposed to be reflecting sunlight. The fact that it's colder is counterintuitive. It would be interesting to try the experiment on a moonless night to check the difference between open and shaded ground. If they are the same the shade doesn't likely matter (given a sufficient time from sundown).
- s1artibartfast 3y agoYou could do the light bulb dirt test in a room without windows or another light source.