4 ms·
Wouldn't cost that much if the transcribing is done on device
by jabradoodle 3y ago
Wouldn't cost that much if the transcribing is done on device
- camdat 3y agoThis would be immediately obvious in a cursory analysis of performance. On-device transcription is not only computationally infeasible, it would also require model capabilities far beyond what is currently SOTA. Google had (and has afaik) significant challenges implementing multiple wake-word detection for precisely this reason. Transcribing a couple of words accurately on-device without a major performance penalty (so that it can be running in the background always) is just _barely_ coming out now.
- jabradoodle 3y agoI would have to take your word for it but my phone is able to transcribe speech with no problem and no internet connection. Of course running it 24/7 in the background would ruin my battery, you would have to be smarter than that.
- camdat 3y agoWhich phone/app? I would be very surprised if a manufacturer has an entirely on-device real-time ASR model, maybe I'm behind.
- ct520 3y agorewind.ai has entered chat.
- yomlica8 3y agoThere's this weird narrative I see that "computers just aren't powerful enough" to do things I remember them already doing on Pentium 1 class machines in the 90s.