4 ms·
Compared to light-weight graphics (think early X programs), are TUI really that much more performant? I understand they ARE now light-weight, portable and (re
by makapuf 3y ago
Compared to light-weight graphics (think early X programs), are TUI really that much more performant?
I understand they ARE now light-weight, portable and (relatively) simple.
Besides, cli are composable, but TUIs are not.
- nkjnlknlk 3y agoI don't think they're much more performant than a GUI created with performance in mind. I think they're almost by default more performant with the lowest effort/lazy approach? TUIs can be composable as well but you are 100% correct that I overstated the case.