2 ms·
The answer is in the article: their understanding is that the current interface feels chaotic to users, and this new interface will "tame the chaos" and help yo
by zdragnar 3y ago
The answer is in the article: their understanding is that the current interface feels chaotic to users, and this new interface will "tame the chaos" and help you focus.
Personally, I suspect it will benefit one type of user (DMs across multiple slack organizations) and hurt others (one workspace, many team channels with focused topics in each). This is where people get upset with redesigns- everything for everyone is suboptimal for everyone, but there's a good chance nothing else is better... that doesn't stop them from trying, though.
I'm in the latter, and from a very brief glance at the new screenshots, I hate it. I'll reserve actual judgement until I have to use it, but I'm not optimistic that I'm the target audience for the new design.
- pavel_lishin 3y agoOne nice thing is that the "activity" tab finally separates reactions and mentions; it's wild that in the current state, they're lumped together, making the tab wildly useless. Everything else looks worse - like you said, optimized for people in multiple Slacks who need to stay on top of all of them. I'm in multiple personal slacks, and I do not want them mixed in any way. I'm in one work slack, so this new redesign is probably bad for me. This definitely feels like the old WYSIWYG move - optimizing for product managers, who coincidentally enough have a heavier hand in deciding how Slack itself changes than individual contributor users.