> RISC-V is inevitable. Why? Some people here seem to be weirdly obsessed with RISC-V when it's likely to end up being even more closed/proprietary than ARM (a

> RISC-V is inevitable. Why? Some people here seem to be weirdly obsessed with RISC-V when it's likely to end up being even more closed/proprietary than ARM (at least on the high-end). Why would you give away your competitive advantage to everyone else by licensing your core designs? ARM at least provides more or less an even playing field to everyone. It's much cheaper for competitors to catch-up with Gravitron since they can just license the exactly same core it's built on. If it was a RISC-V CPU and as much ahead it would be way easier for AWS to maintain it's moat.