4 ms·
> However, the apology [0] says that the creator did not "intend" to participate in AI that can "create zero-effort impersonations of artists." I'm not sure if
by fenomas 3y ago
> However, the apology [0] says that the creator did not "intend" to participate in AI that can "create zero-effort impersonations of artists." I'm not sure if the wording is unintentionally vague, or if there is some way his project could be used in that way.
This seems FUDdy. "Intend" isn't in the apology at all, and the wording that is there says clearly that generative AI came after prosecraft, so there's no way the tool could be used for it.
> It's unclear whether he was planning to use the books he scraped
This also seems unwarranted. The tweet about fine-tuning an LLM came 5-6 years after the guy made prosecraft; why suggest they might involve the same dataset?
- actuallyalys 3y agoI apologize for the quotes around intend. I wrote it without, then I forgot it was a paraphrase and added them back again. Unfortunately, I cannot edit my comment to fix that. I do think “intend” is a reasonable paraphrase of “never wanted to.” (Edited to add) I don’t think prosecraft was a finished project and he was definitely still working on his other tool for writers that incorporates some of the same tools. > The tweet about fine-tuning an LLM came 5-6 years after the guy made prosecraft; why suggest they might involve the same dataset? The reason being that he had mentioned he was planning to use the scraped books for future analysis.
- Tokumei-no-hito 3y agoSo you can edit your OP and this comment but can’t edit “intend”?
- fenomas 3y agoHN comments cannot be edited once two hours have past.