3 ms·
Bro, you’re too simple. Are you even printing your own chip wafers? Do you ever key your passwords outside places where you have total physical control? On t
by bravura 3y ago
Bro, you’re too simple.
Are you even printing your own chip wafers?
Do you ever key your passwords outside places where you have total physical control?
On that note, do you let your love person stay over for the night (have physical access to your flat)?
Your incompetent and flabby security posture makes me want to puke. At the very least, admit that your security posture is „typical educated HN reader“ and you’re not serious, so the rest of us can continue on our business without your mind numbing puerile distractions.
[okay that rant was really just a „holier than thou“ parody about how if you’re going to maintain a security posture that’s more tense than 90% of your peers, at least acknowledge what threat model you espouse and acknowledge that others may have a different one. If you had been like: „is this your threat model? Then why don’t you care about this…“, you would have my upvote not my snark. Even if that weren’t my threat model I would have found that exposition commendable.]
- pessimizer 3y agoYes, realizing that you can't trust the ownership of a company to stay consistent for eternity is basically like thinking your mate is working for the government to steal your passwords. What investment do you have in people trusting VPN providers that would cause you to make an argument like that? I bet none, it's just a bad instinct.
- yieldcrv 3y agoi2p, tor. whonix distribution of linux, tails… but ok I didnt expect the sarcastic tone of responses but I also dont understand why people act like sports team fans of VPN providers. there are other solution, easily accessible, that do more than VPNs can do, depending on your threat model a VPN user that supposedly just wants to avoid adtech tracking doesnt need annual audits about how little data one VPN stores over the other