I'm disappointed he went for "vividness" and not novelty. Judging text based on how uncommon the n-gram is/how much it differs from an LLM could be interesting

I'm disappointed he went for "vividness" and not novelty. Judging text based on how uncommon the n-gram is/how much it differs from an LLM could be interesting for sure. The better an LLM can complete your joke the worse it is, for instance. Important to have a good Letterman-MacDonald quotient.