I avoid the 'news' from disreputable papers because it's obvious they are regularly lying intentionally to boost a specific political group. OP is washington p

I avoid the 'news' from disreputable papers because it's obvious they are regularly lying intentionally to boost a specific political group. OP is washington post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/06/clinton-questions-whether-sanders-is-qualified-to-be-president/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04... or https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/04/07/sanderss-incorrect-claim-that-clinton-called-him-not-qualified-for-the-presidency/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/04/... These are not possible to reconcile, obviously Bernie Sanders was not the liar. The swamp beat Bernie.