2 ms·
The only time I've heard the expression about multipolar was from Chinese and Russian Foreign Minister playbook. Add "NATO", "Russophobia", "Nazis", "Western"
by rvnx 3y ago
The only time I've heard the expression about multipolar was from Chinese and Russian Foreign Minister playbook.
Add "NATO", "Russophobia", "Nazis", "Western" and other keywords in the soup and you have the perfect anti-Western speech.
It's not even a Western tool.
Sanctions are a tool to refuse to trade with opponent regimes, and it works both ways
(China has sanctions on the West too, for example on semiconductors. Russia has sanctions too against the West).
It's not perfect, and it has side-effects, but overall it deters other countries / terrorist organizations to follow the same path of taking an hostile posture against you.
If you let people go around sanctions, then becoming hostile will simply have no consequences.
If there are no consequences to actions, and there is a big prize to win, then the politics will do it, no matter what.
- jasonvorhe 3y agoIf all you read is propaganda by one empire or another, it's no wonder you immediately associate a term with propaganda. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarity_%28international_relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarity_%28international_rela... Interesting quote: > In April 2023, the Australian government released their 2023 national review where it is outright stated that the age of American unipolarity and primacy in the Indo- Pacific is effectively over, paving way to great power competition and a more fractious world order. It's new to me that Australia is known to spread Russo-Chinese propaganda either.