> If EFF cares no much about privacy on the web they should be in favor of this proposal. Not true at all in the slightest, even with the sorry explanation Goo

> If EFF cares no much about privacy on the web they should be in favor of this proposal. Not true at all in the slightest, even with the sorry explanation Google employees tried to conjure. > To prevent ad fraud either you need to increase the fingerprintablity of users on the web, violating people's privacy, or implemented a form of remote attestation, which protects people's privacy. Not true either, you don't have to do any of that. And why exactly should the client be responsible for ad fraud? These suckers, advertisers, try to track me without consent for years and abuse every legal gray area there is. Boot me from a service if you don't like my client for all I care, just be transparent about it. > You can even make an attestation service for your own browser. I don't want that. I do indeed vet clients connecting to my service to defend against attacks, but WEI comes with a cost I would never be willing to pay.