3 ms·
Yeah, I find that weird too — everybody does. It’s a legacy of the early 90s. But the case under discussion is single-argument constructors, which can also be
by gumby 3y ago
Yeah, I find that weird too — everybody does. It’s a legacy of the early 90s.
But the case under discussion is single-argument constructors, which can also be considered conversion operators.
- Guvante 3y agoNo, the topic was "implicit isn't the right default" It was a mistake that can't be fixed saying "C++ doesn't need implicit as a keyword so it is better" is wrong when explicit is the better default if you need one.