3 ms·
I'm pretty sure OpenAI is reading HN. Today, just 6 hours back, ChatGPT in GPT-4 mode couldn't answer a short version of question: "Mable’ died at 11 PM. Was sh
by two_in_one 3y ago
I'm pretty sure OpenAI is reading HN. Today, just 6 hours back, ChatGPT in GPT-4 mode couldn't answer a short version of question: "Mable’ died at 11 PM. Was she alive at noon?"
But now, look at this:
User: Mable’ died at 11 PM. Was she alive at noon?
ChatGPT: Yes, if Mable died at 11 PM, she was alive at noon of the same day. Noon is 12 PM, which comes before 11 PM on the same day.
User: Mable’s heart rate at 9 AM was 75 bpm and her blood pressure at 7 PM was 120/80. She died at 11 PM. Was she alive at noon?
ChatGPT: Based on the information provided, Mable had vital signs at both 9 AM and 7 PM. If she died at 11 PM, it can be inferred that she was alive at noon on that day.
- two_in_one 3y agoThe main question is how did they do it? They must have some rules or facts 'book' (database, or something else), which is accessed by the model(s). It was a case earlier when ChatGPT falsely claimed someone was a criminal. And they fixed it quickly (within a few days, if I remember correctly), probably the same way.