3 ms·
Those responses sound very similar (albeit a little less extreme) to glitch tokens [1]; these are created by the tokenizer using the full dataset, but the corre
by n2d4 3y ago
Those responses sound very similar (albeit a little less extreme) to glitch tokens [1]; these are created by the tokenizer using the full dataset, but the corresponding training samples were then thrown out before GPT was trained (eg. some glitch tokens were usernames participating in r/counting).
Such words resulted in GPT not learning their meaning and assigning an embedding vector near zero, making the tokens "meaningless". The sole existence of these in a prompt broke the model completely. OpenAI has since fixed that in the hosted APIs.
[1] https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aPeJE8bSo6rAFoLqg/solidgoldmagikarp-plus-prompt-generation https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aPeJE8bSo6rAFoLqg/solidgoldm...
- jablongo 3y agoYea thats what I was thinking. Is "sunflower seed math" a glitched concept embedding that can break it? I think the "embedding vector near zero" would account for when the model can't recognize glitch tokens, but not when it starts talking about ultron or whatever in the lesswrong glitch token research.