5 ms·
Salinity issues aside, in my understanding locks generally don’t pump water at all: they work entirely on gravity. In effect this means that a burst of water fl
by kgermino 3y ago
Salinity issues aside, in my understanding locks generally don’t pump water at all: they work entirely on gravity. In effect this means that a burst of water flows downstream every time the lock is cycled.
- pseingatl 3y agoCorrect.
- iancmceachern 3y agoExactly, they basically harness the natural water cycle (rain to watersheds to waterways to ocean). The one exception is with these new locks, I bet they pump a bunch of the water back now instead of releasing it, that's how I expect they get the 60%.
- Animats 3y agoNope, it's not pumped. It's a clever system where there are several storage basins at different levels.[1] In the 1960s and 1970s, there was a nuclear reactor mounted on a ship to provide power for the Panama Canal. This reduced water loss via the hydroelectric plant at Gatun Dam, leaving more water for the locks.[2] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal_expansion_project#Water_saving_basins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal_expansion_project... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MH-1A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MH-1A
- iancmceachern 3y agoTruly incredible, thank you!
- slashdev 3y agoPerhaps the solution is as simple as invest in more electric generating capacity in Panama. At 8 degrees off the equator, solar is plentiful. One could use lake Gatun for pumped hydro storage as well.
- nocoiner 3y agoWould there be enough elevation change to generate significant hydropower, though?
- slashdev 3y agoIt currently generates hydropower, so I suppose so.
- SoftTalker 3y agoAnother comment says ships are raised 85 feet during the transit, that sounds like enough to me if that is correct (not a hydropower engineer)
- nocoiner 3y agoApparently it’s 6 MW, which ain’t nothing, but isn’t a tremendous amount either. I don’t know what a typical battery storage facility can put out instantaneously - I would think more, perhaps substantially more. Though the lake certainly would have the capacity advantage!
- iancmceachern 3y agoAnother commenter noted that they did this in the 60s and 70s, apparently there was a floating nuclear reactor there so they didn't need so much hydro power, keeping the reservoir more full
- Cthulhu_ 3y agoBut they therefore depend on rain to work; thanks to climate change and changing weather patterns, that's no longer as predictable as it once was. I mean when it comes to the Panama canal, pumping water upstream is an option, but as another commenter mentioned, it's a lot of water and will therefore cost a lot of energy to do.