3 ms·
I am going to give my cynical self a pat in the back. Back in March 2022 I was calling out Gemini as a fad that had no reason to exist. https://news.ycombinator
by rglullis 3y ago
I am going to give my cynical self a pat in the back. Back in March 2022 I was calling out Gemini as a fad that had no reason to exist. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30802376 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30802376
- jamilton 3y agoSomeone losing interest in Gemini isn't really evidence that's true.
- rglullis 3y agoBut the people using Gemini are still using flawed reasoning and there is still nothing in the protocol that can not be done with HTTP.
- jamilton 3y agoThe same arguments from that linked comment still apply and make sense to me but don't seem to hold water for you, so I won't rehash them.
- flagrant_taco 3y ago> and there is still nothing in the protocol that can not be done with HTTP. This argument itself is using flawed reasoning. Gemini was purposely designed as a subset of HTTP rather than a superset, starting with a tough approximation of HTTP 0.9. Of course everything that is supported in Gemini can also be implemented in HTTP.
- rglullis 3y ago[dead]